“Food consumption for a day is about 12000 KJ. There are 86400 seconds in a day, so the mean power output (assuming no losses) will be about 140 W. Enough to illuminate a room. My guess is that generating power say by using an enzymatic generator (gluciose oxidase?) would be pretty inefficient so we would only be extracting mW.”

The only main thing that I doubt, what are the possible ways that a human can contribute into power supply? Possibly, the heat that we generated? But isn’t that insufficient? Enzymatic generator like as fore-mentioned? Well, that is just too little. How about electrostatic force? I bet electric eels do better. Nevertheless, I find that using our metabolic energy throughout our lifetime will rather sound better than the rest. Indeed, I am not referring to only one human being used..

  However, at the present day for urban Earthlings to have thought about this is rather nonsensical. Typically, matters regarding human rights, defying laws of nature, and so on are part of the counter effect of this controversial issue. But I still do have this tingling thought about humans’ potential to contribute power. As human population rises dramatically, we surely need to dig up more power from the resources at present in order to support the ‘basics’ of urban life with it. Surely, we may have a lot of alternatives like dams, windmills or even solar. But what if one day all of these failed us? As in like, there are not enough space left to build dams or, the whole population of trees are being replaced by windmills etc. Could there be a possibility that will mislead us into this state of revulsion?

 As part to counter the growth of human population, we can be a little bit more cold hearted than the Chinese (baby boys that are borned in the hospital are being crastated). Why not use them as batteries?

 I came to this theory that anti-matter exist and it is denoted by a negative ’-’ unit of mass from my physics teacher in form 5. Anti-matter describes the opposite charge of the subunit of matter that we are made up of. Instead of an electron (negatively charge), a positron (positively charge) instead is revolving the nucleus which is negatively charge. And when a matter collides with an anti-matter, annihilation of both parties will occur in proportion to its mass. This will then release a lot of energy in the form of gamma rays and also x-rays. 

 And now, here’s my thought. Since our solar system is only located in the segment of the intergalactic gas (3.6%) in the universe..a large proportion of it is dark energy (73%) and dark matter (23%). It could be that another world will exist on the other side of the universe but it is entirely made up of anti-matter. And since trace of of anti-matter can be detected from black holes, and the theory of black holes opens a worm hole, why not it be a possibility that the anti-matter from the other side of the universe flows into our intergalactic space? Possibly, after long I have thought, could there be another Earth which is made up of anti matter on the other side? If it does, could there be another us? Surely it will be a horrendous mistake to touch the other me knowing that I do not have a twin brother. After all research for aliens have failed, could there be a possibility that the other part of the universe is reciprocal to us?